Andrew Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since OIO does not include any medical terminology (or "data
> model" as Tim Churches puts it)
A terminology is not a data model. And OIO does (I think) have a data
model, in fact many, user-definable data models, which results in an
underlying physical data model like this (using an E-R style diagram,
where --> means has zero or more):
Patient
-->FormA
-->FormB
-->FormC
-->etc
Or if you prefer a more O-O view:
PatientInstances
-->FormInstances
-->Value-AttributeInstances
The latter view doesn't show that there are various Value-Attribute
subclasses available, but UML diagrams in ASCII are a bit challenging to
compose. Of course, I have only superficial knowledge of OIO, so I might
be completely wrong.
Tim C