openhealth-list  

Messages by Date

• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Thomas Beale
• 2003/08/28 Re: URL_callable application interface, was Re: graph from patientdata Thomas Beale
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Horst Herb
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Horst Herb
• 2003/08/28 RE: graph from patient data Tim Churches
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Horst Herb
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Adrian Midgley
• 2003/08/28 Re: URL_callable application interface, was Re: graph from patient data David Forslund
• 2003/08/28 RE: graph from patient data Tim Churches
• 2003/08/28 RE: URL_callable application interface, was Re: graph from patient data Tim Churches
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data David Forslund
• 2003/08/28 URL_callable application interface, was Re: graph from patient data Andrew Ho
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data David Forslund
• 2003/08/28 RE: graph from patient data (more) Tim Churches
• 2003/08/28 RE: graph from patient data Tim Churches
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data Andrew Ho
• 2003/08/28 Re: graph from patient data David Forslund
• 2003/08/04 Re: Delaware dramtic plans Richard Schilling
• 2003/08/04 Re: IOM EMR Wayne Wilson
• 2003/08/02 IOM EMR david derauf
• 2003/07/31 Announcing GT.M V4.4-002 and V4.4-FT01 K.S. Bhaskar
• 2003/07/30 ADL - Archetype Definition Language Thomas Beale
• 2003/07/29 Re: Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Douglas Carnall
• 2003/07/25 Re: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system in SouthAfrica Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
• 2003/07/24 Switching to Open Source Software Tim Cook
• 2003/07/24 Delaware dramtic plans david derauf
• 2003/07/24 RE: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
• 2003/07/24 Re: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system in SouthAfrica Etienne Saliez
• 2003/07/24 Re: Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Etienne Saliez
• 2003/07/24 "unsubscribe" jon hoeksma
• 2003/07/23 Re: Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Richard Schilling
• 2003/07/23 Re: Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Ignacio Valdes
• 2003/07/23 Re: Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/23 Announcement (WARNING: SAD) Brian Bray
• 2003/07/22 Re: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system Tim Cook
• 2003/07/22 RE: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system Beza, Fil
• 2003/07/22 OptoLight Re: Open-source hospital level medical stock controlsystem Tim Cook
• 2003/07/22 Re: Open-source hospital level medical stock control system Tim Churches
• 2003/07/07 Re: telemedicine via satellite Jel Coward
• 2003/07/06 Re: FreeB:: Billing Item equality Fred Trotter
• 2003/07/05 Re: OpenEMed to use SNOMED, Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Richard Schilling
• 2003/07/05 Re: OpenEMed to use SNOMED, Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed David Forslund
• 2003/07/05 OpenEMed to use SNOMED, Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed aho
• 2003/07/05 Re: TORCH's data model, was Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHSannouncement regarding Snomed) Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/05 Re: TORCH's data model, was Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHSannouncement regarding Snomed) Tim Cook
• 2003/07/05 Re: SNOMED CT in U.K., was Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Adrian Midgley
• 2003/07/05 Re: SNOMED CT in U.K., was Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/05 TORCH's data model, was Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHS announcementregarding Snomed) Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/05 Re: FreeB:: Billing Item equality Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/07/04 TORCH Import Tim Cook
• 2003/07/04 Re: SNOMED CT in U.K., was Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Adrian Midgley
• 2003/07/03 Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed David Forslund
• 2003/07/03 Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHS announcement regarding Snomed) Tim Cook
• 2003/07/03 Re: Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHS announcement regarding Snomed) Tim Churches
• 2003/07/03 Re: OIO's data model (was RE: HHS announcement regarding Snomed) Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/03 SNOMED CT in U.K., was Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/03 Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Adrian Midgley
• 2003/07/03 Re: Gratis vs Liberated Adrian Midgley
• 2003/07/03 OIO's data model (was RE: HHS announcement regarding Snomed) Tim Churches
• 2003/07/03 Re: HHS announcement regarding Snomed Andrew Ho
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Pat
• 2003/07/01 Re: guidelines for taxpayer funded software Tim Churches
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Tim Churches
• 2003/07/01 Re: guidelines for taxpayer funded software Sujai \"Ron\" Nath
• 2003/07/01 Re: guidelines for taxpayer funded software Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/07/01 guidelines for taxpayer funded software Horst Herb
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/07/01 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Pat
• 2003/06/30 Re: CALL FOR 150 DEVELOPERS/etc Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/30 CALL FOR 150 DEVELOPERS/etc Douglas Carnall
• 2003/06/30 Re: Fwd: CALL FOR 150 DEVELOPERS/SYSTEM ANALYSTS/PROJECT MANAGERS. Great opportunity for Open Source development! [[email protected]] Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/30 European patents and open source Tim Churches
• 2003/06/30 [Fwd: Billing issues] Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/30 Re: Fwd: CALL FOR 150 DEVELOPERS/SYSTEM ANALYSTS/PROJECT MANAGERS. Great opportunity for Open Source development! [[email protected]] Tim Churches
• 2003/06/30 Fwd: CALL FOR 150 DEVELOPERS/SYSTEM ANALYSTS/PROJECT MANAGERS. Great opportunity for Open Source development! [[email protected]] Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/30 Billing logging, legal issues Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [Fwd: [torch] views on "clean demo" site] Pat
• 2003/06/30 Re: telemedicine via satellite Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/25 "Free software" misleads? was Re: Richard Stallman sheds light onSCO vs. Free Software Andrew Ho
• 2003/06/25 Re: Richard Stallman sheds light on SCO vs. Free Software Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/25 Richard Stallman sheds light on SCO vs. Free Software Andrew Ho
• 2003/06/24 Re: question re current EHR/data submit software Andrew Ho
• 2003/06/24 3rd HL7 Australia Conference on Decision Support Standards open for registration Klaus Veil
• 2003/06/24 Re: question re current EHR/data submit software Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/06/24 Re: question re current EHR/data submit software Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/06/24 question re current EHR/data submit software Heitzso
• 2003/06/24 RE: Keyword tagging of clinical documents Kantor, Gary
• 2003/06/24 RE: Keyword tagging of clinical documents Tim Churches
• 2003/06/24 Re: Keyword tagging of clinical documents Dr. David H Chan
• 2003/06/24 RE: Keyword tagging of clinical documents Joseph Dal Molin
• 2003/06/17 Re: Evaluating EHR Tim Cook
• 2003/06/17 Re: Evaluating EHR - Billing Problem, EMR problem Falball
• 2003/06/17 ... Scripting in existing systems: novel outputs etc [was: ....] Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/17 Re: Evaluating EHR Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/16 Re: Clinical Trial Management System Calle Hedberg
• 2003/06/16 Something useful for the FreeBill project Smith, Todd
• 2003/06/16 Re: Evaluating EHR - Billing Problem, EMR problem Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/16 IMPORTANT RE PERSONAL ATTACKS Dave Scott
• 2003/06/16 Re: Evaluating EHR Falball
• 2003/06/16 Thompson blasts state of health care IT david derauf
• 2003/06/16 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Horst Herb
• 2003/06/16 Tim Churches Andrew Ho
• 2003/06/16 Re: Re: The evils of software patents - 2nd try Tim Churches
• 2003/06/16 Re: portable electronic record size Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/06/16 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release Thomas Beale
• 2003/06/16 Re: portable electronic record size Michael D. Weisner
• 2003/06/16 Re: portable electronic record size Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/16 Shared EMR data initiative david derauf
• 2003/06/16 Re: Re: The evils of software patents - 2nd try Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/16 Re: EHR on a stick, Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relationaldatabases may not be the right tool for medical records Thomas Beale
• 2003/06/16 Re: alternatives to OIO, was RE: evaluating EHR, Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/06/15 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release Ron Fox
• 2003/06/15 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release John Gage
• 2003/06/15 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release John Gage
• 2003/06/15 Re: The evils of software patents Tim Churches
• 2003/06/15 Re: The evils of software patents Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/15 Re: Question was RE: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relationa l da tabases may not be the right tool for medical records (fwd) Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/15 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release Ron Fox
• 2003/06/15 RE: The evils of software patents richard clark
• 2003/06/14 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release David Forslund
• 2003/06/14 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/14 Re: FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release David Forslund
• 2003/06/14 FreeMED Billing .02 alpha release Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/14 RE: The evils of software patents Smith, Todd
• 2003/06/14 The evils of software patents - 2nd try Tim Churches
• 2003/06/14 The evils of software patents Tim Churches
• 2003/06/14 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/14 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Adrian Midgley
• 2003/06/14 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/06/14 Re: EHR on a stick, Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/06/13 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records [[email protected]] Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/13 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/09 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/09 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may notbe the right tool for medical records Tim Churches
• 2003/06/09 Re: GT.M as OODBMB was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: re lational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/09 Question was RE: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records Shaw, Nikki
• 2003/06/09 Re: Java interface to GT.M was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/09 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/09 Re: Java interface to GT.M was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/09 Re: Java interface to GT.M was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHRwas: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Tim Churches
• 2003/06/09 RE: Java interface to GT.M was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Smith, Todd
• 2003/06/09 RE: GT.M as OODBMB was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Smith, Todd
• 2003/06/09 Re: Some GT.M thoughts was RE: Federated Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/09 Java interface to GT.M was: Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may n ot be the right tool for medical records Richard Schilling
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Standards and Interoperability (was federation...) David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Tim Churches
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: Fred Trotter
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may notbe the right tool for medical records Tim Churches
• 2003/06/07 Re: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may not be the right tool for medical records David Forslund
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may notbe the right tool for medical records Tim Churches
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases may notbe the right tool for medical records Tim Churches
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/07 Re: Federated or Consolidated EHR was: relational databases maynot be the right tool for medical records Tim Cook
• 2003/06/06 Re: VistA use: research question Wayne Wilson
• 2003/06/06 VistA use: research question Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/06/06 RE: Bring your laptops/PCs to the Sacramento meeting Andrew Ho
• 2003/06/06 RE: Bring your laptops/PCs to the Sacramento meeting Pat
• 2003/06/06 For what it's worth dept.: SCO vs the World Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Adrian Midgley
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Status #1 Adrian Midgley
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Alexander Caldwell
• 2003/04/06 Re: On Jabber as a User only... Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/06 Re: On Jabber as a User only... Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Status #1 Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 Re: On Jabber as a User only... Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/06 Re: On Jabber as a User only... Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 Re: Perl or Python (was instantiated in Billing) Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 FreeMED Status #1 Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/06 Re: FreeMED Billing Project Karsten Hilbert
• 2003/04/06 On Jabber as a User only... Fred Trotter
• 2003/04/04 Re: Open Source adoption research in health care Ignacio Valdes
• 2003/04/04 Re: Open Source adoption research in health care Joseph Dal Molin
• 2003/04/04 Draft of paper about Debian-Med Andreas Tille
• 2003/04/04 Re: Open Source adoption research in health care Horst Herb
• 2003/04/03 Open Source adoption research in health care Obal and Jin
• 2003/04/03 press coverage of developments from OSHCA 2 Adrian Midgley
• 2003/04/03 Draft Essay on OS Mgt... Daniel L. Johnson
• 2003/04/02 Re: AAFP EHR project Adrian Midgley
• 2003/04/02 Re: AAFP EHR project Andrew Ho
• 2003/04/01 Re: AAFP EHR project summary Andrew Ho

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]