On Fri, 14 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote: ... > Joseph and I both like the utter simplicity of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That nicely includes the concepts of discussion, announcements of new > projects and releases, events etc > > Any other reactions, suggestions?
Tim, Integrating OSHCA with OpenHealth is a wonderful idea that I fully support, except for the quagmire that currently surrounds the transfer of OSHCA.Org domain to OSHCA's current "interim board". With the OSHCA.Net vs. OSHCA.Org fragmentation unresolved, I think it would be wise for us to avoid association with OSHCA.Net or OSHCA.Org. Dan Johnson already offered to pay $10/year to register a new domain for our new List. Please let's keep OpenHealth away from the entangled OSHCA mess. For the record, I suggest that the current OSHCA "interim board" members (who are also OpenHealth List members) should immediately identify themselves to the OpenHealth List community - since there may be potential conflict of interest involved in these "merger" discussions. Just my opinion, Andrew --- Andrew P. Ho, M.D. OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes www.TxOutcome.Org
