Calle,

> Remember that this is a very small country (250,000 people) - just a little
> big bigger than one of our sub-districts here in South Africa (we have 250
> of them). For a population as small as that you can use nearly any dbms.
You shouldn't, especially when technically better alternatives
are available under the same or better conditions.

> Nevertheless, it's a positive development - FOSS is moving ahead
Sure, so I said.

> The Health (Management) Information Systems Programme I'm working with now
> covers wholly or partially countries/states with around 200 mill people. We
> are moving towards DBMS independence for our solutions, but MySQL at the
> moment seems to be the logical FOSS option (many states/provinces are
> already using ORACLE, MS SQL or DB2, so it obviously makes sense for them to
> host health data in the same DBMS).
I am completely baffled as to why this makes MySQL the logical
FOSS option ?!?

BTW, I *have* read the article.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

Reply via email to