I do notice as far as performance go that it does feel a little like you are running 
through a VNC
connection.   It is faster, but the screen painting is a little delayed as in a VNC 
conection.  Still
seems pretty reasonable to me given the overall portability of the system.

Dave

> ------------Original Message------------
> From: "David Forslund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'Horst Herb'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> Date: Fri, Oct-22-2004 11:08 AM
> Subject: RE: Virtual Privacy Machine
>
> 
> Around 5 years ago we demonstrated a full medical record and the 
> software running on a flash memory card.
> We did this for the DoD who was/is distributing flash memory cards to 
> all their soldiers.  This enables
> just as claimed here the ability to view a medical record with software 
> directly on the card.  In our case
> we used a JVM as the portability platform and included a JVM on the 
> card to run the application.  We would
> then provide a JVM on the card for each system that the card was 
> attached to.  This is identical to what happens
> with the emulator that enables the running of linux.  The security is a 
> problem as in both cases the database
> could be copied from the card by the host os.   However, this could be 
> encrypted so that copying the database
> would be of little value or at least make it hard to decrypt.  I think 
> this approach is pretty promising and it
> worked quite well for us 5 years ago, and I still have the code that 
> works on any windows machine.  In addition,
> similar to this case, it could connect securely to external servers if 
> desired/necessary.   
> 
> In any case, it makes a good platform for people wanting to demonstrate 
> an application on a system without having
> to reboot into another operating system.  As for performance, I found 
> it worked quite well on my 1.4GHz Pentium M 
> notebook.   It could be that the performance others have seen may be 
> hampered by the low bandwidth of the memory card or 
> a USB 1.1 connection.  The emulator doesn't seem to be a problem, for 
> me at least.
> 
> Dave
> > ------------Original Message------------
> > From: "Tim Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Horst Herb'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, Oct-21-2004 7:09 PM
> > Subject: RE: Virtual Privacy Machine
> >
> > From: GPCG Talk List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > > Behalf Of Horst Herb
> > > Sent: Friday, 22 October 2004 9:53 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [GPCG_TALK] Virtual Privacy Machine
> > > 
> > > The seems to resolve many of our security problems arising 
> > > from inadequate choices of software and operating system: 
> > > http://pvpm.metropipe.net/
> > > 
> > > I will review it and comment when I am finished, but this 
> > > looks like something EXTREMELY promising, and might even be 
> > > expanded to a complete electronic heath record system on a 
> > > USB stick (not just the data, but the software to view and 
> > > modify the health records as well)
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to