> ------------Original Message------------ > From: "Tim Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'David Forslund'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'Horst Herb'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, Oct-22-2004 3:41 PM > Subject: RE: Virtual Privacy Machine > > From: David Forslund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, 23 October 2004 3:08 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Horst Herb'; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Virtual Privacy Machine > >
> > The only flaw with this scheme is that the host computer is able to > intercept the decryption password(s), as well as copy the encrypted > contents > from the memory card or stick -> game over. of course. Connecting through any foreign system is a big risk. In our case, we would use the portable record only on a known system. It just provided easy of transport. Dave > > Tim C > > >
