> (B) Proposals: please provide feedback on both of the following
> proposals. Note: no feedback means agreement to the majority votes.
> (1) Should we ,at least, request both distros to
> pickup 2.10.2? I saw major changes listed on the
> openhpi.org page.
> (2) Target a stable 2.12 release for July 25 to pick
> up 2.10.2 fixes and iLO2 RIBCL plug-in.
> That means, developers have a time to commit features
> and fixes by July 18. I can make a 2.12 branch by July
> 19 and we all start regression test and fix for the
> new branch.
The information in wiki reflects the current state for Fedora and Red
Hat, so RHEL 5.2 already contains 2.10.2. RHEL6 will be probably based
on Fedora 10 or 11, so 2.12 need to be there first. I don not expect
that the next stable version will be available earlier then during the
next year.
I am fine with (2) because it makes sure that 2.12 will be in Fedora 10.
I will post the remaining patches for NSS support later this week.
Dan
--
Dan Horák
Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
