Hi David,
commit the change. I will test it on coming Friday. If you don't hear anything
from me than it works or I will look for myself to fix it.
Thanks in forward!!
Ciao
Lars
Am Dienstag, Oktober 11, 2011, um 08:44:52 pm schrieb David McKinley:
> Hi Lars,
>
> It is nice to hear from you! :-)
>
> I don't have any problem committing the change. I just have never run the
> dynamic simulator, and don't intend to. So, other than seeing a clean
> compile, if I make this change it will not be tested. Thus, I'm reluctant
> to do so unless you are saying that you will test it after I make the
> change.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lars Wetzel [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:42 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Anton Pak; David McKinley
> > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Bugs 3414203 & 3414205
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > the dynamic simulator is similiar to the ipmi direct plugin. Which
> > means: what
> > works for the ipmi direct plugin should also work for the simulator.
> >
> > As I already wrote in the past - I see me only as a placeholder for the
> > ipmi
> > direct plugin until someone else will maintain it. Due to missing test
> > opportunities I will not fix such issues and I think it is better for
> > the
> > community that I do it in such a way ;-)
> > One thing is to have it compile clean - but another to see if the
> > change works
> > as expected ...
> >
> > It would be nice if David can merge the fix for the impidirect plugin
> > also in the
> > simulator plugin.
> >
> > And Anton, why should you hear something from me? - Nobody has problems
> > with the
> > dynamic simulator and I don't have any time for enhancements ... So
> > enjoy the
> > time in which is silent from my site ... :-)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Lars
> >
> > Am Dienstag, Oktober 11, 2011, um 08:22:13 pm schrieb Anton Pak:
> > > David,
> > >
> > > OK, lets fix it in IPMI Direct only (trunk and 3.0.x branch).
> > >
> > > Anton Pak
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:17:07 +0400, David McKinley
> >
> > <[email protected]>
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Anton,
> > > >
> > > > I certainly can. My only hesitation is with the Dynamic Simulator.
> > > > Since I am not familiar with this, I don't have a easy way to test
> >
> > the
> >
> > > > fix. I have tested it with the ipmidirect plugin - so maybe I
> >
> > should
> >
> > > > just fix that one, and let someone who knows more about the dynamic
> > > > simulator deal with it there.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:18 PM
> > > >> To: [email protected]; David McKinley
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Bugs 3414203 & 3414205
> > > >>
> > > >> David,
> > > >>
> > > >> It would be nice if you are ready to do those fixes.
> > > >> I haven't heard from Lars for several months.
> > > >> The same about IPMI Direct.
> > > >>
> > > >> Anton Pak
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:59:59 +0400, David McKinley
> > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > >>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Anton, or whoever is coordinating the 3.0 release -
> > > >> >
> > > >> > These bugs (hangs due to releasing a lock that was not first
> > > >>
> > > >> acquired)
> > > >>
> > > >> > were identified to be fixed in 3.0, but are still showing open
> >
> > and
> >
> > > >> > assigned to Lars Wetzel. Is there still an intention to make
> >
> > the
> >
> > > >> > trivial changes to fix them? I have not checked in the fixes,
> >
> > since
> >
> > > >> > when the bugs were entered, they were assigned to someone else.
> >
> > I
> >
> > > >> > presumed that this meant Lars was going to make the change.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > David
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------
> >
> > > > ----- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> > > > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> > > > security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this
> >
> > data
> >
> > > > and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------
> >
> > > --- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> >
> > contains
> >
> > > a definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> > > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and
> >
> > makes
> >
> > > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains
> a definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
