So you are seeing different set of events in the Resource Event Log?
Could you confirm it with hpiel client util?
Is this resource event log provided by the oa_soap plug-in?
Anton Pak
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:36:43 +0400, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is an NSN app. Process which polls for events in an opened HPI
> session and also retrieves history events.
>
> We will be looking only for Resource Event logs.
>
> Regards
> Naveen S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:38 PM
> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
> IN/Bangalore)
> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>
> Hello Naveen,
>
> I don't get it.
> Incoming events, events in Domain Event Log, or events in Resource Event
>
> Log?
> What app: hpi_shell, hpialarms, hpiel, hpievents or NSN created app?
>
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:02:43 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I say Alarms, they are Sensor/Resource/HotSwap events.
>>
>> Regards
>> Naveen S
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 7:26 PM
>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>> IN/Bangalore)
>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>
>> Hello Naveen,
>>
>> BTW, by alarm you mean HPI alarm in the Domain Alarm Table?
>> Or something completely different?
>>
>> Anton Pak
>>
>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:46:03 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Anton,
>>> I have a process which will call OpenHPI API's to retrieve the
> Alarms.
>>>
>>> When I ran my process with 2.14.1, I saw only the below errors, so
>>> removed 2.14.1 and installed 3.0.0, after this started getting the
>>> alarms.
>>>
>>> Next time when I removed 3.0.0 and installed 2.14.1, I got few alarms
>>> along with the below errors but with 3.0.0, I was getting alarms as
>>> usual,
>>> So I thought I will get it confirmed from you people if 2.14.1 has
>> some
>>> problems so that I will have some strong reason to communicate to
> RHEL
>>> to
>>> integrate the newer version of OpenHPI or else I will have to live
>> with
>>> 2.14.1 it self.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Naveen S
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ext Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 7:04 PM
>>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>> IN/Bangalore)
>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>
>>> Hello Naveen,
>>>
>>> Those messages were produced by OpenHPI daemon, not by a client app.
>>> I think if you run you app in another console window you will not see
>>> them.
>>>
>>> In the text you quoted in you first mail I counted 9 alarm lines.
>>>
>>> And finally:
>>> - what app do you use for getting alarms?
>>> - what is the difference you notice between 2.14.1 and 3.0.0 besides
>>> those
>>> "Requested RDR is not present" messages?
>>>
>>> Anton Pak
>>>
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:25:07 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Anton,
>>>>
>>>> It is openhpi-2.14.1-3.el6.x86_64.rpm, I had typed it wrongly.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to retrieve at least few alarms if I go ahead with
>>>> openhpi-2.14?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Naveen S
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ext Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 6:40 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>> IN/Bangalore)
>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>
>>>> Hello Naveen,
>>>>
>>>> Seems I got some understanding about those messages.
>>>> In 3.0.0 they were just removed from source code.
>>>> The reason was:
>>>>
>>>> A saHpiXxx function printed warning/error message and returned error
>>>> code
>>>> defined in the HPI spec.
>>>> So the message was redundant.
>>>>
>>>> So my belief is that the error condition is still silently present
> in
>>>> 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> I see you got the alarms with 2.14.1 and with 3.0.0, right?
>>>>
>>>> Anton Pak
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:33:41 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know how to proceed further.
>>>>> It is because I have to request RHEL to integrate the latest
> version
>>>> of
>>>>> OpenHPI if the older version(openhpi-2.14.1) doesn't have
>>>>> Complete support for alarms or the below given errors are fixed in
>>> the
>>>>> newer of OpenHPI
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 7:59 AM
>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>> Subject: FW: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Any information on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:07 AM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hemantha
>>>>>
>>>>> OpenHPI-2.14: version with which I saw some errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will I be able to see the hardware alarms coming from OA if
>>>>> OpenHPI-2.14.1 version is used instead of openhpi-3.0.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:56 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. betweenOpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hemantha,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, it was a typo mistake.
>>>>>
>>>>> openhpi-2.14.1-3.el6.x86_64.rpm is the one which I used.
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: ext Beecherla, Hemantha [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:07 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. between OpenHPI-2.1.4and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Naveen,
>>>>> I have searched for openhpi-2.1.4 in svn, but I can't find this
>>>> version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know from where did you get openhpi-2.1.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI, configuring oa_soap plugin with openhpi-2.1.4 is invalid.
>>>>> If you find this issue with Openhpi-2.14.x?
>>>>>
>>>>> Then please go for the 3.2.x release, which is going to be released
>>> on
>>>>> 13th Aug 2012.
>>>>>
>>>>> Below are available Openhpi release versions in SVN.
>>>>>
>>>>> openhpi - Revision 7492: /openhpi/branches
>>>>>
>>>>> * ..
>>>>> * 2.10.x/
>>>>> * 2.11.x/ -----> from this release we have oa_soap plugin
>>>> added
>>>>> to Openhpi Project.
>>>>> * 2.12.x/
>>>>> * 2.13.x/
>>>>> * 2.14.x/
>>>>> * 2.15.x/
>>>>> * 2.16.x/
>>>>> * 2.17.x/
>>>>> * 2.5.x/
>>>>> * 2.6.x/
>>>>> * 2.7.x/
>>>>> * 2.8.x/
>>>>> * 2.9.x/
>>>>> * 3.0.x/
>>>>> * 3.1.x/
>>>>> * 3.2.x/
>>>>> * OPENHPI/
>>>>> * RELEASE_1_0/
>>>>> * SDAGUE_EXPERIMENTAL/
>>>>> * branch_1_x/
>>>>> * branch_2_0_x/
>>>>> * branch_2_2_x/
>>>>> * branch_2_3_x/
>>>>> * branch_2_4_x/
>>>>> * experimental/
>>>>> * initial/
>>>>> * modular/
>>>>> * newsimulator/
>>>>> * release_0_7/
>>>>> * release_0_9/
>>>>> * release_1_9_0/
>>>>> * release_1_9_1/
>>>>> * release_1_9_2/
>>>>> * release_1_9_3/
>>>>> * release_2_0_0/
>>>>> * release_2_1_0/
>>>>> * release_2_1_1/
>>>>> * release_2_1_2/
>>>>> * release_2_2_x/
>>>>> * release_2_5_0/
>>>>> * release_2_5_1/
>>>>> * renier-experimental/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks& Regards,
>>>>> Hemantha Reddy
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:01 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. between OpenHPI-2.1.4 and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hemantha,
>>>>>
>>>>> handler liboa_soap {
>>>>> entity_root = "{SYSTEM_CHASSIS,1}"
>>>>> OA_User_Name = "xxxxxxx" # OA user name with admin
>>>> privileges
>>>>> (required)
>>>>> OA_Password = "xxxxxxx" # OA password for above user
>>>> (required)
>>>>> ACTIVE_OA = "xxxxxxx" # Active OA hostname or IP address
>>>>> (required)
>>>>> # STANDBY_OA = "hostname" # Standby OA hostname or IP
> address
>>>>> (optional)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> The above is the only plug-in that I had configured in case of
>>>>> OpenHPI-2.1.4 and also in OpenHPI-3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: ext Beecherla, Hemantha [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 9:17 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>>> IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. between OpenHPI-2.1.4 and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Naveen,
>>>>> FYI, ilo2_ribcl and oa_soap plug-ins are added to OpenHPI from
>> 2.11.x
>>>>> release onwards.
>>>>> Could you please let me know which plug-in you have configured in
>>> your
>>>>> setup and openhpi version too.
>>>>> Is it happened in openhpi-2.14.x with ilo2_ribcl/oa_soap plug-ins
>>>>> configured?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks& Regards,
>>>>> Hemantha Reddy
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:41 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>>> IN/Bangalore)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. between OpenHPI-2.1.4 and
>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Naveen,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope it doesn't.
>>>>> Just my observations:
>>>>>
>>>>> - I cannot find 2.1.4 on the OpenHPI site.
>>>>> 2.1.2 and 2.2.0 were released in 2005.
>>>>>
>>>>> - The error message was produced in saHpiRdrGet().
>>>>> Seems your app tried to get RDR along with alarm.
>>>>> Btw, what app did you use for getting alarms?
>>>>>
>>>>> It could be that the issue is HP plug-in specific.
>>>>> Let's see what HP guys say.
>>>>>
>>>>> There were several bugfixes that can be relevant to the issue:
>>>>>
>>>>> #2798414 hpi_shell always reports "No alarms in DAT" event there is
>>> an
>>>>> alarm.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2798414&group_id=71730&;
>>>>> atid=532251
>>>>>
>>>>> #2782786 alarm is not removed from DAT
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2782786&group_id=71730&;
>>>>> atid=532251
>>>>>
>>>>> Anton Pak
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:56:11 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>>> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Anton,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it mean that I cannot retrieve the alarms using
> OpenHPI-2.1.4?
>>>>>> Is it like I have to move to newer version of OpenHPI to get the
>>>>>> required information?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: ext Anton Pak [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:14 PM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]; Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>>>> IN/Bangalore)
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Reg. diff. between OpenHPI-2.1.4 and
>>>>>> OpenHPI-.3.0.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Naveen,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.1.4 is very old.
>>>>>> May be you installed 2.14.1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anton Pak
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:34:18 +0300, Shivegowda, Naveen (NSN -
>>>>>> IN/Bangalore) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have installed OpenHPI-2.1.4 and OpenHPI-3.0.0 on 2 HP Blades.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Blade with OpenHPI-2.1.4 gives the following error when I try
>>> to
>>>>>>> retrieve the alarms:
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[11]->RDR[11], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[12]->RDR[12], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[13]->RDR[13], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[14]->RDR[14], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[15]->RDR[15], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[16]->RDR[16], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[17]->RDR[17], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[18]->RDR[18], is not present)"
>>>>>>> 07-08-2012 14:16:53 141-9995 minor "OEM:blr05::
>>>>>>> openhpid: ERROR: (safhpi.c, 1708, Requested RDR,
>>>>>>> Domain[0]->Resource[18]->RDR[18], is not present)"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the same errors are not seen on OpenHPI-3.0.0 installed
> Blade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to know whether this was an issue in 2.1.4 version and
>>>> fixed
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> 3.0.0 or some configuration issues?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Naveen S
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------
>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>>> Discussions
>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>>> malware
>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>>> Discussions
>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>>> malware
>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>>> Discussions
>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>>> malware
>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>>> Discussions
>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>>> malware
>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>>> Discussions
>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>>> malware
>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------
>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>>> Discussions
>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>>> malware
>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------
>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>> Discussions
>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>> malware
>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>> Discussions
>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>> malware
>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
