On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:49:15 -0700 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean> Shouldn't we be able to keep the ib_req_notify_cq at the end > Sean> of this function? If additional completions are left after > Sean> polling, a second event should be generated. Or at least > Sean> that's what I remember from out discussions about this... > > On Mellanox HCAs but not necessarily on spec-compliant HW... I realize that, but I thought that's the behavior that we agreed that the API would have. I'm really fine either way, but want to be clear on the behavior. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
