On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:44:56 -0400 Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:30, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > I think this is still not quite right: what if a receive fails? > > > > As a suggestion, we can allocate 2 CQs per QP, one for receives, > > and one for sends. This would let us separate send from receive > > completions based on the callback. > > Another alternative is to assume it is a receive if it is not a send is > not matched. I think we have other issues with the completion handling as well. Since we use a single CQ for both QPs, I think that we need to search the send_posted_mad_list to find the corresponding completion. We cannot assume that the completion matches with the request at the head of the list. This appears to be broken in the non-error case as well. I will happily create a patch to fix these issues. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
