>>>>> "Hal" == Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hal> I can see now that this is wrong and have a fix for what
Hal> stops IPoIB from working. The problem was that the response
Hal> was received by the MAD layer but not dispatched due to the
Hal> change(s) noted above.
Hal> So I am patching at least enough to get things operational
Hal> for now. Please confirm that it works for you. I will not
Hal> touch things until I hear that it does.
Yes, IPoIB works for me again.
Hal> Also, it seems to me that no response needs to be handed to
Hal> process_mad. Does this optimization make sense ?
I'm not sure I understand the question. process_mad definitely needs
a buffer to return a response in. Are you suggesting that process_mad
overwrite the input buffer when it generates a response? That's
probably OK although I'm not sure if it's much of an improvement
(process_mad will probably have to allocate a response buffer
internally and copy the response when returning).
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
