On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:36, Roland Dreier wrote: > Yes, IPoIB works for me again.
Thanks for validating. > Hal> Also, it seems to me that no response needs to be handed to > Hal> process_mad. Does this optimization make sense ? > > I'm not sure I understand the question. process_mad definitely needs > a buffer to return a response in. Are you suggesting that process_mad > overwrite the input buffer when it generates a response? That's > probably OK although I'm not sure if it's much of an improvement > (process_mad will probably have to allocate a response buffer > internally and copy the response when returning). I'm asking about also checking the method prior to calling process_mad. If the method is a response method (e.g. GetResp for one), we could bypass calling process_mad. Or is this not worth the extra checks in the MAD layer as it is low enough overhead and adds additional protocol knowledge into the MAD layer ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general