On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 18:46 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Maybe you should lay down the requirement first.
I'll take a crack at it. Let me know where I am off base. > - why do we need an intermediate API To get things working today with the code that people have already written. To create a proof of concept. In any event, I am not proposing this API get kernel inclusion. Only a wider audience than in the sourceforge DAPL project cvs tree. > - what differences does it ?? > - what devices does it abstract IB for now, any other RDMA capable transports later. > - what are the users NFS over RDMA, maybe -- so RPC. Anybody else know others? -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
