On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:38:50AM +0200, Yaron Haviv wrote: > Even if your approach to DAPL was right you still have address > translation service in SDP, and would need one for NFS/RDMA, and another > one to iSER and another one for Lustre, etc' (even if they are coded > directly to the verbs) Not to mention other protocols that access the SA > (e.g. SRP, ..). > > So is your idea to duplicate that functionality for all the ULPs ? > Would that make the code simpler and easier to maintain ?
Get the code out first and then see what can be shared and what not, there's no way to find a sane API otherwise. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
