Tom,
My original plan was to branch as you suggested, but I was warned that maintaining synchronization with the base code line would be difficult.
We don't anticipate needing to make substantial driver modifications for DAPL. I'd be surprised if more than a handful of files (< 10) changed. Currently only the Makefile and Kconfig need to be updated.
Given that, does Libor's suggestion to place the code in gen2/users make sense or would you still recommend a full branch?
james
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Libor Michalek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:06:29PM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 10:10 -0500, James Lentini wrote:Should I follow the above plan? Are there any other suggestions?
I think you should either branch trunk or roland-uverbs and put all the DAPL stuff in there so that it can easily be merged back to trunk when it is ready.
Either branch as Tom suugests, or if you want to maintain the code against the head of tree I would suggest placing it somewhere besides the brach directory, such as the gen2/users directory. (e.g. gen2/users/jlentini)
-Libor
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
