On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:37 -0500, James Lentini wrote: > Tom, > > My original plan was to branch as you suggested, but I was warned that > maintaining synchronization with the base code line would be > difficult. > > We don't anticipate needing to make substantial driver modifications > for DAPL. I'd be surprised if more than a handful of files (< 10) > changed. Currently only the Makefile and Kconfig need to be updated. > > Given that, does Libor's suggestion to place the code in gen2/users > make sense or would you still recommend a full branch?
Really, it is up to you. It makes it easier for *me* to play with DAPL if I can checkout a whole tree into drivers/infiniband that will compile kDAPL properly than to pull this from here and that from there and then patch with this. -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
