On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:13 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:56:58PM -0700, Bob Woodruff wrote: > > kDAPL is intended as a kernel-level API > > for RDMA enabled fabrics. As it was initially written, > > it does not meet the Linux coding style and that is why > > it is being totally reworked as we speak to meet that goal. > > The codingstyle alone isn't the problem. The whole design philosophy > is rather odd.
As one of the people trying to clean up kDAPL, I would like to know what you think, from a design philosophy, is wrong with it. We *can* correct any daim bramaged parts. Thanks, -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
