Galen> We have software which uses the mellanox shared receive
    Galen> queue and we are seeing a substantial performance penalty
    Galen> (on the order of 4-5 usec on 0 byte messages). I don't know
    Galen> all the technical details but if you could keep this in
    Galen> mind when working on the shared receive queue perhaps the
    Galen> performance penalty could be much less in gen2.

Is this performance penalty in the software?  It seems much more
likely that the issue is in the hardware implementation of SRQ.

 - R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to