On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: ... > > The same as last time, the code didn't change at all. It's still > > totally ignorant about such essential things as dma mapping, has > > creative new abuse for struct iovec, it's still based on iovecs, > > "... still based on kdapl" of course
Yeah, I was wondering about that. When I was off on vacation in July (and OLS), kDAPL was committed to the svn repository. Has anyone reviewed that? I was under the impression kDAPL would never make it into the openib.org source tree. Or has something changed? grant _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
