Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:38, Sean Hubbell wrote:
I looked at the arp table and the ib0 device is not listed. The state is
marked as ACTIVE for port 1. Does this mean that a connection to opensm
has been established and not necessarily that this interface has been
enabled for use (meaning the connection to opensm with over eth0 instead
of ib0)?
If there are no ARP entries on an ib<n> interface, I don't think it
would show up there. If you ping an explicit address on that ib<n>
subnet, you would see something like:
? (192.168.0.2) at <incomplete> on ib0
Yes, sorry I should have mentioned I pinged the address before I ran arp
and received a reply.
I presume you've modprobe'd ib_ipoib and ifconfig'd ib<n> to get it up
and running (ifconfig -a shows ib<n> in an UP state).
Yes, I have checked the modules for each node and all are there. This
was actually the first thing I looked at as I thought that IPoIB was not
there.
Yes, each ib0 is up supporting multicast.
Sean
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
