On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:17, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:04, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > > >>Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >>>[same patch just generated with diff -up] > >>> > >>>OpenSM: OpenIB vendor layer: Implement osm_vendor_delete > >>> > >>>[I've done some testing of this; are there any regressions for this ?] > >> > >>OpenSM call osm_vendor_delete during osm_opensm_destroy. > >>It is invoked during exit. > > > > > > Actually, it should have said "Implement osm_vendor_unbind" rather than > > delete. > Well the semantics are very old. We stick to the old osm_vendor_api.h. Maybe > we should not have. > But now we have too much depending on this API that I urge you not to modify > it if possible.
I didn't change the semantics. I implemented the OpenIB version. Recall that Yael had indicated this was needed when she started on the 1.8.0 merge work. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
