Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 06:33, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
Is this what you are referring to ?
Yes the line of interest is:
__osmv_sa_mad_rcv_cb: Count = 7 = 800 / 112 (16)
This shows 16byte extra in the data size.
Should it be 20 for the SA class header size or 0 here ?
Should be 0. Means an the packet size should accommodate an integer number of
SA records (after removing the headers size).
I do also see:
Sep 20 05:16:40 995667 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name: ERR
0370:
ib_query failed (IB_REMOTE_ERROR).
Sep 20 05:16:40 995673 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name:
Remote
error = IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_NO_RECORDS.
Sep 20 05:16:40 995678 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name:
Expected
num of records is : 1, Found number of records : 0
The full osmtest flow has some intentional errors injected.
If it provides the "PASSED" message at the end it means that
the errors were intentional and expected.
Some of the flows have a special output message that wraps the
errors in a section like:
"vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv"
...
"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"
We probably need to apply this convention to all the "bad flows".
Then is expected number of records in this test 1 rather than 0 ?
-- Hal
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
