>> There's no point in making this asynchronous, since we're
>> putting the source/dest information in the CM REQ private data.
Guy> Do we have to wait to an ibta approval to do this or can this
Guy> be implemented right away, in this fashion ?
Certainly we should coordinate with the IBTA spec, but my feeling is
that we reached consensus on using CM private data instead of ATS.
Guy> iSER, today, uses sid of 64bit, other ULP's might use 64bit
Guy> sid's too, why limit them to 16 bit ?
How do you implement 64 bit SIDs over iWARP? The whole point of this
API is to use IP addressing, which means IP address + port number.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
