Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > What does SDP use this for? > > > > > > Same thing as AT right now. > > > > Except SDP drops netdevice and route reference counts after sending an > > arp :) > > So SDP wouldn't take advantage of a pointer to access IPoIB private data > if this were available ?
I think it would, that would be cleaner than what I do now. However, I dont think SDP needs this pointer after the point where it sends an arp request. Why does AT need to keep netdev reference for longer? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
