On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:10, Sean Hefty wrote: > > 4. ATS registration > > sean> I think that ATS registration/deregistration should be integrated > > with > > sean> IPoIB. > > > > I don't think there is a consensus around that, but I don't know all > > details. > > This makes more sense to me than having the ATS code deference IPoIB private > data structures.
That's just the way it is implemented today. There could be a public way to get the device, port, and pkey from IPoIB. > However, if adding an rdma_ptr to the net_device can avoid > this, then that will work. Good. Then there's agreement on adding this at leaast amongst the OpenIBers. > And to be clear, I was referring to only > registration/deregistration, not ATS queries. It looks like the ATS code > periodically scans all network devices in the system looking for changes in > order to update the ATS records. Where do you see that ? I think it only does that on notification events from netdev or inet. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
