OK. I will update the proposal for IBTA based on this feedback and all other feedback posted. I will still separate private data usage proposal and port mapping one.
If your Apps depends on 64 bytes of private data, please, raise your voice now. ARkady Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Appliance phone: 781-768-5395 375 Totten Pond Rd. Fax: 781-895-1195 Waltham, MA 02451-2010 central phone: 781-768-5300 > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 7:19 PM > To: Richard Frank; Lentini, James; Roland Dreier > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; Davis, Arlin R > Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP > emulationprotocol > > > It's probably fine to go ahead and reduce the IPC private > data - I think we > (Oracle) can work around this. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Lentini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roland Dreier" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>; > "Davis, Arlin R" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 7:12 PM > Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP > emulationprotocol > > > > Oracle's uDAPL ipc implementation uses 64 bytes of private > connection > > data - currently - some of this is the result of having 64 > bytes to use at > > the start - so we designed around this. We can probably reduce this > > somewhat. And of course if we want to rewrite our > connection handling for > > uDAPL (add our own wire protocol) we can probably skip > using the uDAPL > > connection data all together. > > > > For RDS we use our own connection data sent via datagrams which has > > always > > been part of the Oracle UDP ipc implementation. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Roland Dreier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "James Lentini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "Richard Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[email protected]>; "Davis, Arlin R" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:56 PM > > Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP > > emulationprotocol > > > > > >> James> The D is somewhat misleading. It refers to the > >> James> functionality provider to the consumer application. > >> > >> Right, that's what we're talking about. The RDS > implementation only > >> needs a few bytes of private data on top of the IP address > info. So > >> the RDS implementation itself is clearly OK with any of > the proposals > >> being discussed here. > >> > >> However, Rick mentioned that Oracle needs 64 bytes of > private data in > >> both directions for connections. My question was how > Oracle works on > >> top of RDS, which does not provide any private data to consumers. > >> > >> - R. > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
