Christoph> we also currently prefer svn for the 1.0 release. At
Christoph> some point we'll have to backport bugfixes to the 1.0
Christoph> release found in a later development version. Having
Christoph> to do that at all isn't really fun, but having to keep
Christoph> some of that code in "sort of" sync between different
Christoph> repositories is even more difficult.
There seems to be some confusion here. There would only ever be one
libibverbs repository. The only question is whether it remains in svn
or moves to a different SCM.
In fact moving to git would make porting patches between different
branches far easier.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
