Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>I didn't follow what changes are necessary to improve the connection > >>rate. Can you clarify? > > > > > >Changes in the CM protocol so that a 3 way handshake can occur so that > >for example a lower MTU connection can be accepted with one REQ/REP/RTU > >sequence without REQ/REJ then REQ/REP/RTU. > > Okay - this is what I thought. Personally, I don't think that it makes > sense to change the architecture to optimize for hardware that happens to > perform poorly under a given condition.
Okay, but then we need to implement the REJ/retry sequence. I think it affects at least CMA and maybe CM. > What would happen if the hardware simply reported that it only supported a > smaller MTU? To SM? IPoIB wont work - in requires 2K MTU. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
