On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 13:24 -0500, James Lentini wrote: > > > uDAPL should be included. The different providers were developed to > > support 3 different OpenIB configurations: OpenIB verbs (when there > > was no user space CM), OpenIB verbs + IB CM, and OpenIB verbs + RDMA > > CM. I recommend you include the openib_cma provider and the user space > > RDMA cm library. > > OK, thanks. Someone will need to write RPM spec files for these > components. Is this something someone at NetApp can do? I can do it. When do you need the spec file? > > kDAPL does not need to be in the release, although it would be trivial > > to include it. > > My understanding is that kDAPL has been vetoed for inclusion in the > upstream kernel, That's correct. > so I do not currently see any point in shipping it. Ok. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
