I'll second Woody's suggegstion. Most items are in the SVN because there are interested parties. We should have some criteria for what to remove rather than what to include.
Dan On 2/24/06, Bob Woodruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hal wrote, > >Also, what about librdmacm ? libibcm ? > > > As far as I can tell, most of the rest of OpenIB userland (libibcm, > > libibat, libibmad, etc) is logically part of OpenSM, > > Perhaps another way to determine what should be in the release > is to take everything that is currently in the trunk (say svn rev 5491), and > then discuss removing stuff that is no longer needed or not > yet ready. > > woody > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
