On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 20:56, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > > libibat > > > > libibat-debuginfo > > > > libibat-devel > > > > libibat-utils > > > > > > The kernel modules to support these are obsolete. We should > > > remove them from the release. > > > > Fine by me :-) Are we killing off the kernel code, too, in > > parallel? > > I'm still waiting to hear all consumers have moved to addr/CMA. The kDAPL OpenIB provider still uses IBAT. I'd like to see a copy of this code available from OpenIB, but it does not have to be on the trunk. For my purposes a copy in https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/shaharf-ibat would be acceptable. Any chance that this branch's at.c and at_priv.h could be updated to match the versions on the trunk? I don't know the state of the shaharf-ibat branch. If the current IBAT code wouldn't be consistent with that branch, I don't mind keeping the current IBAT code at https://openib.org/svn/gen2/users/jlentini/ibat _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
