Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: port_num > > Caitlin Bestler wrote: > >How about something along the lines of stating that the > >transport specific CM is responsible for translating 0 to > >a number that does not conflict with the host stack, and > >then leave the details to be implemented as required. > > That doesn't quite work. If there are multiple transports, you want the > same translation.
Most applications don't care. How about we implement this simple thing, and let ULPs override it by passing port !=0 if they want? -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
