Quoting r. Matt Leininger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kernel OpenIB msi_x netperf (MB/s) > 2.6.16-rc5 in-kernel 1 367 > 2.6.15 in-kernel 1 382 > 2.6.14-rc4 patch 1 in-kernel 1 434 > 2.6.14-rc4 in-kernel 1 385 > 2.6.14-rc3 in-kernel 1 374 > 2.6.13.2 svn3627 1 386 > 2.6.13.2 patch 1 svn3627 1 446 > 2.6.13.2 in-kernel 1 394 > 2.6.13-rc3 patch 12 in-kernel 1 442 > 2.6.13-rc3 patch 1 in-kernel 1 450 > 2.6.13-rc3 in-kernel 1 395 > 2.6.12.5-lustre in-kernel 1 399 > 2.6.12.5 patch 1 in-kernel 1 464 > 2.6.12.5 in-kernel 1 402 > 2.6.12 in-kernel 1 406 > 2.6.12-rc6 patch 1 in-kernel 1 470 > 2.6.12-rc6 in-kernel 1 407 > 2.6.12-rc5 in-kernel 1 405 > 2.6.12-rc5 patch 1 in-kernel 1 474 > 2.6.12-rc4 in-kernel 1 470 > 2.6.12-rc3 in-kernel 1 466 > 2.6.12-rc2 in-kernel 1 469 > 2.6.12-rc1 in-kernel 1 466 > 2.6.11 in-kernel 1 464 > 2.6.11 svn3687 1 464 > 2.6.9-11.ELsmp svn3513 1 425 (Woody's results, 3.6Ghz > EM64T) >
BTW, Matt, it might be interesting to compare 2.6.13-rc3 patch 1 against -rc1 and -rc2 with patch 1, to try and track down the last bit of performance degradation in IPoIB. Could you look into this? -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
