On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Dotan Barak wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 17:50, James Lentini wrote: > > > OpenIB-cma u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 > > > "mthca0 1" "" > > > OpenIB-cma0-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 1" "" > > > OpenIB-cma0-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 2" "" > > > OpenIB-cma1-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 1" "" > > > OpenIB-cma1-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 2" "" > > > OpenIB-cma-netdev0 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib0 0" "" > > > OpenIB-cma-netdev1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib1 0" "" > > > OpenIB-cma-netdev2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib2 0" "" > > > OpenIB-cma-netdev3 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib3 0" "" > > > OpenIB-scm u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so mv_dapl.1.2 > > > "mthca0 1" "" > > > OpenIB-scm0-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 1" "" > > > OpenIB-scm0-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 2" "" > > > OpenIB-scm1-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 1" "" > > > OpenIB-scm1-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 2" "" > > > OpenIB-scm-netdev0 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib0 0" "" > > > OpenIB-scm-netdev1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib1 0" "" > > > OpenIB-scm-netdev2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib2 0" "" > > > OpenIB-scm-netdev3 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplscm.so > > > mv_dapl.1.2 "ib3 0" "" > > > > > > is this file is good enough or more dapl provider names are needed? > > > > You've covered all the standard combinations. Why did you include the > > OpenIB-Z-netdevX entries? Why would a user prefer netdevX over ethY? > > Just curious. > > > > If you are willing to contribute this back to the uDAPL project, I'm > > sure the uDAPL community would find it very useful. > > I tried to create automatically a configuration file that is being > filled manually today. Which lines do you think need to be in this > configuration file? (I'm open for suggestions). Why did you include the OpenIB-Z-netdevX entries? Why would a user prefer netdevX over ethY? > This dat.conf generator is a new piece of code that (when it will be > ready) will be checked to the openib stack (i think to the dapl > tree), so it can be availabe to everyone ... Thank you. We'll make a spot for it in the uDAPL tree. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
