Thomas> I am planning to test this some more in the next few
Thomas> weeks, but what I'd really like to see is an IBTA
Thomas> 1.2-compliant implementation, and one that operated on
Thomas> work queue entries (not synchronous verbs). Is that being
Thomas> worked on?
No current hardware supports that as far as I know. (Well, ipath
could fake it since they already implement all the verbs in software)
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
