On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:51, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > Hi Roland, > > > > This is OK but it's sort of a pain to have to query SA ClassPortInfo > > all the time. Do you have a plan for how to make this transparent to > ULPs? > [EZ] Well, a ULP that uses CMA will have it handled by CMA... > But an old SM implementation that does not support this kind of > PathRecord extension will probably choke on the new fields once their > component mask bits are set.
What do you mean by "choke" ? Wouldn't the new components just be ignored ? > You could however query once for each Client-Reregister event. > > > > (BTW something in your email client is really messing up the > > formatting of your message) > [EZ] Thanks I will resend . > > > > - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
