> > > [EZ] Well, a ULP that uses CMA will have it handled by CMA... > > But an old SM implementation that does not support this kind of > > PathRecord extension will probably choke on the new fields once their > > component mask bits are set. > > You could however query once for each Client-Reregister event. > > Right, but for example SRP cannot use the CMA because the SRP protocol > does not use IP addressing. > > It seems that the SA query module is really the right place to handle > the query of ClassPortInfo, caching results, invalidating cache on > client-reregister, etc. [EZ] Yes I agree SA client might be the right place for dealing with the different SA optional capabilities . > > - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
