>> This should work if we can determine whether the SEND is a new operation or a >> response to some other request. > >Isn't ib_response_mad doing this?
It should. We just need to ensure that it identifies the MADs correctly. >> After further testing, this patch breaks osmtest as a result of modifying the >> TID for a SEND. > >What does the test do? Hmm... I just reran the test, and it worked now. Now I'm really confused as to what the problem was. The SM / SA classes don't use SENDs, so I was struggling to understand the issue. Maybr I'm hitting into some sort of SM conflict that takes a while to resolve itself... >> I could just ignore SENDs like the existing code did, but I'm >> not convinced that that's the right thing to do. > >What does Jack's patch do? Jack's patch operated beneath the MAD interface, so left the TIDs unchanged. It relied on user_mad to set the TIDs correctly. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
