On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, John Partridge wrote:
> The resulting build from your last patch has been installed and we > are in the process of DAPL tests now. I do know that the libdat > works with Intel MPI (although we had to manually create a symlink > from libdat.so.1 to libdat.so - should this not already exist?) Did you install dapl rpm or dapl-devel rpm? The dapl rpm should have libdat.so.1 inside it. > I do have one question about how the dapl RPM's are organized, we are > creating a DAPL interface for the ccNUMA xpmem on SGI Altix systems. > At the moment we have a libdat and libdapl(xpmem). It is our objective > to use the OFED-1.0 libdat, as libdat will be used for non-infiniband > interfaces I don't quite understand why libdat (dat.conf) are not a > separate RPM and the libdapl interfaces installed in a separate RPM ? > Would his not make more sense ? The DAPL provider library can have an arbitrary name. You should name your DAPL provider something unique (e.g. libdaplxpmem). _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
