Rimmer, Todd wrote: > Perhaps we should pursue changing this in the IBTA spec. Being able to > post to the SQ while in RTR makes handling of the Comm Est/RTU race with > the CQ callback much easier to handle. > > It would be better if the IB spec permitted posting to the SQ in RTR but > indicated the SQ would not be processed until the QP moved to RTS. I > believe the present Mellanox silicon/firmware implements such behavior.
Compared to the actual need and complexity induced on the driver for supporting proxy-ing of TX WRs, I think this (IBTA-ing and implement-ing the thing) is overdoing which should be avoided. Since with Sean's patch it is ensured that an established event would be generated by the CM, a passive side IB consumer (eg iSER/SRP/NFS targets) can queue an incoming RX till the event comes in. Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
