Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > (which, as I understand it, is really only an issue because opensm can > > > log so much), > > > which is what this entire patch series was designed to > > > address. They are two different problem spaces. > > > > So ... wouldn't it be better to address the real issue? > > As I see it, the problem only appears if you activate opensm in the verbose > > mode. And the reason to run so for a long time is only if you suspect you'll > > want to debug something later, without killing opensm. > > Those patches are still pending and won't be in OFED 1,1, right ?
Well, I donnu. If it's assumed reducing log size is important enough for 1.1, then maybe applying these patches are the way to go? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
