> Looking at the problem more, I think that the issue extends to the remote 
> port 
> LID as well.  My expectation with a local path record query is that the SLID 
> is 
> the local port, and the DLID is the local router.  This should be sufficient 
> for 
> one-way UD traffic, but for connected traffic we still need to discover the 
> remote router and remote port LIDs.

Given a path record query for:

SGID - local
DGID - remote

What would be the SLID and DLID?

And if the query is reversed, such that:

SGID - remote
DGID - local

Are the SLID/DLID values simply reversed?

What if the DGID in the second case were a multicast GID?  What does the SLID 
become in this case?

- Sean

_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to