Mike, Nat, and John thank you for your work here! It's clear that you've put a lot of thought and time into them. I think they'll be really useful in helping the entire board better understand some of the differences and setting a path forward.
I'm wondering where the comma belongs in, "The foundation will prioritize creating and promoting deployment of solutions enabling the six focus scenarios previously discussed." Is this that the foundation will prioritize solutions which enable all six focus scenarios or that it will prioritize up to six solutions where each focuses on one or more scenarios? I'd like to propose another resolution especially given the resolution around providing better tools. "The foundation will open source tools it creates (either directly or via contractors) unless the board determines that there is a compelling reason not to do so." --David On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > This note finishes delivering the content that Nat, John, and I prepared for > Thursday’s meeting. It adds the spreadsheet Table of Features by Scenario. > I also added the board meeting agenda as the first slide of the opening > presentation. The set of resolutions is unchanged. > > > > For the committee, > > -- Mike > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OpenID board] OpenID Strategy and Goals materials, plus proposed > Resolutions > > > > Dear board, > > > > I’m attaching a version of the OpenID Strategy and Goals material that Nat, > John, and I have developed in response to the board’s resolution at IIW. A > set of proposed resolutions to be considered at the end of our Thursday > board meeting is also enclosed. > > > > We’re sending these to you now so you can review them before the meeting. I > know that Dick also plans to send his material for review. > > > > What’s still missing is a table listing what potential OpenID protocol > features are needed to support the 6 proposed focus scenarios intended to > inform our OpenID specification efforts. John has done a mighty work > gathering requirements from many parties and producing this. I’m still in > the process of making it pretty but didn’t want to hold up the rest of the > content for this, since the rest of it is reasonably mature. Expect to see > the table as well shortly. > > > > For the committee of John, Nat and myself, > > -- Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board > > _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
