As for voting, unless the proposed alternative voting system enables proxy 
voting and voting using members registered OpenIDs, we can't use it without a 
change to the IPR process (which requires a vote of the membership to do).  
Also, for reasons of supporting our own technologies, I believe that we want to 
continue having people vote with their registered OpenIDs.

Having been on the elections committee as long as we've had elections, my sense 
is that we've gotten the bugs out of the election system by now, and it meets 
our needs.  Besides, it's paid for.  Integrating a new voting system into our 
existing membership software (or creating new membership software) would both 
be costs we would have to understand before undertaking any changes in that 
regard.

My sense is that the remaining costs of using it have to do with us having 
Darren do things that we could do for ourselves.  (If there's any reason we 
can't do them ourselves, we should remedy that before or during this upcoming 
election.)

I *do* think we should monitor the costs of running the 2013 election with the 
current software so that we have data to base any decision to make a change (or 
not make a change) on.

                                -- Mike
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 4:42 PM
To: [email protected]; Don Thibeau (OIDF ED)
Subject: [OpenID board] Infrastructure update

Don,

Another issue that the board has to tackle is the infrastructure update.
As I understand, the current infrastructure is very expensive to run an 
election/membership voting.

At the same time, you have been indicating the intension to move the current 
web page infrastructure from Wordpress to Drupal.
I suspect these two are dealt with together.

I would appreciate any update on it in the next EC call so that we can report 
it back to the board.

FYI, I have built a Drupal site that copied most of the Wordpress content with 
the URLs intact.
Drupal also has a module called Advanced Voting, which seems to be capable of 
doing the voting that does not reveal the result until it is closed.
With a shopping card module, it seems it is capable to unify the copropate 
website, membership, and the voting capability.

--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board


_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board

Reply via email to