I ammended http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID_Attribute_Exchange_Extension_2_0
to include the scope:

"Define a lightweight registration mechanism for AX attribute type schemas."

If you do not think this is ready for formal consideration by
specs-council, please raise your objection here and now.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:06 PM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even if we go for the big hug theory of cross protocol Attributes,  We will
> still need a schemas group for PAPE, XRD tyoes etc.
>
> John B.
> On 2009-09-17, at 7:30 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>
>> Glad to hear Dick back in this list. Dirk, could we immediately move
>> to form the AX 2.0 WG (hopefully with a membership that is
>> representative)? I believe (and not because I am a member) that the AX
>> 2.0 WG needs to be the party addressing this issue because of the
>> necessity of preserving some coherence within the AX spec. The WG
>> should make a formal proposal to either move this into the umbrella of
>> OIDF or take it out, and get the bless for spec-council for either
>> option on a reasonable time frame.
>>
>> We have numerous speculative threads in this issue. At this point, the
>> very possibility of a result (whatever it may be) appears to me as an
>> unqualified win.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Paul Trevithick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The only difference, e.g., between an Open AX URL attribute and an
>>> IMI-infocard URL claim is who’s authoritative over minting it. The
>>> question
>>> for the OIDF is this: Are the benefits of being able to be authoritative
>>> over the attribute URL minting process, greater than the benefits of
>>> letting
>>> go of that authority and increasing interoperability in the overall open
>>> identity ecosystem?
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> PS: The ICF said, hey we need a place for folks using the IMI protocol to
>>> know where the attribute URLs are listed. So we created [1] along with a
>>> very light-weight email-based process for getting new URIs added. It all
>>> works fine. This is clearly one way to answer the above question.
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.informationcard.net/index.php/Claim_Catalog
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/17/09 4:48 PM, "Allen Tom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Given that everyone using AX seems to be using axschema.org, we should
>>> just
>>> bless it. Perhaps the OIDF should take over running it? We should try to
>>> have an official process (hopefully very lightweight) for adding new
>>> attributes.
>>>
>>> +100 for making the urls shorter, since AX responses usually exceed the
>>> 2KB
>>> URL limit, and have to be sent via POST, causing  UX issues. (browser
>>> warnings if the RP doesn't support HTTPS, an extra "white page" with the
>>> form and the button, JS dependency, etc)
>>>
>>> Allen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>
>>> axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the
>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
>>>
>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference
>>>
>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net.
>>>
>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,  or do
>>> you see axshema.org continuing in some way?
>>>
>>> John B.
>>>
>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>
>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else
>>> contributed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Who controls axschema.org now?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I do personally
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> specs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> specs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Breno
>>
>> +1 (650) 214-1007 desk
>> +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
>> MTV-41-3 : 383-A
>> PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>



-- 
--Breno

+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to