On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Allen Tom <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I was building an RP, I would definitely download and cache the profile
> image for the privacy and security reasons that you stated.
>
> However, many RPs have asked if they can directly link to the profile pic,
> because image hosting costs money, and downloading and caching requires work
> and effort. Also, some RPs would like to have the image automatically
> updated if the user changes it.
>
> With the current Yahoo AX implementation, RPs can deep link to the profile
> image if they want to, however, the image could be deleted if the user
> changes their picture, resulting in a broken image. For the purposes of
> interop, it would be good to clarify what RPs should do with the Profile
> Image url.
>
>

Hi Allen,

My view here is that anything that is not an explicit API with a
support SLA can be trusted to last unchanged. Clarification that the
URL may change will probably not dissuade the RPs that don't have a
good image hosting solution from deep linking to these images. Serving
3rd party images in the domain of the RP's page is actually tricky:
Just search for GIFAR.
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to