Hi Mike,
We were able to take advantage of time at IIW to help shape this proposal as 
well as conversations around the web based on the technical proposal I shared. 
There is plenty of technical work for this Work Group to take on!

It is a formal request to create a Work Group. The Foundation's IPR Process 
instructs you to send Charter proposals to this list for review by the 
Specifications Council.

Thanks,
--David



On May 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> It isn't clear (at least to me) whether your note below is intended as:
>  - a completed charter and formal request to create a working group based 
> upon that charter (without any prior discussion of the charter on the specs 
> list) or
>  - a draft charter being circulated to the specs list for comment and 
> consensus building before making a formal proposal based on the resulting 
> charter.
> 
> Could you clarify the intent of the note below?
> 
>                               Thanks,
>               -- Mike (a specs council member :-) )
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Recordon
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 4:02 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Chris Messina; Joseph Smarr; Martin Atkins; Max Engel; Luke Shepard; Eran 
> Hammer-Lahav; Thomas Huhn
> Subject: Connect Work Group proposal
> 
> Per the OpenID Foundation's IPR Process, below is a Work Group Charter
> proposal for consideration by the Specifications Council.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> 
> Charter:
> 1) Working Group name: Connect
> 
> 2) Purpose: Develop a version of the OpenID protocol optimized for use
> on the web by building on top of OAuth 2.0 and discovery technologies
> such as host-meta while complementing other active OpenID Foundation
> Working Groups.
> 
> 3) Scope:
> - Explore building on top of OAuth 2.0
> (http://wiki.oauth.net/OAuth-2.0) from the IETF for the user
> authorization flows and extension mechanism
> - Explore using the Web Host Metadata specification
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-hostmeta) and Well Known URIs
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785) via SSL for discovery
> - Explore the ability for a rich client (such as a browser) to
> discover and interact with the website on the user's behalf
> - Explore making user identifiers OAuth 2.0 protected resources which
> return profile information and links to other API endpoints possibly
> using JRD (http://hueniverse.com/2010/05/jrd-the-other-resource-descriptor/)
> assuming it is submitted to the IETF
> - Explore the optimal migration path for implementors of OpenID 2.0
> - Explore how the functionality provided by existing OpenID 2.0
> extensions could be re-imagined on top of OpenID Connect
> - Explore how the concept of delegation should evolve
> 
> - Support for simultaneously authenticating the user while also
> authorizing other OAuth 2.0 protected resources that the server is
> able to issue access tokens for
> - Support users explicitly choosing a server or typing in a variety
> of URLs and email addresses for discovery
> - Separate the user identifier from the user's human consumable
> profile URL such that it is hosted via HTTPS, globally unique, and
> never reassigned
> - Drastically reduce the complexity of discovery
> - Reduce the complexity of the verification processes possibly by
> comparing the subdomain of the user identifier and token endpoint
> - Support optional static verification of the token response via a
> signature using symmetric keys
> - Support user interfaces optimized for a variety of screen sizes,
> devices, and languages by learning from the OpenID User Experience
> extension
> - Support the ability to login to non-web browser applications such
> as desktop applications
> - Support dynamic registration of clients
> - Define a standard mechanism and basic set of attributes for servers
> to share basic user profile data with clients
> 
> - Do not prevent the use of asymmetric keys throughout the protocol
> such that it may scale into more security conscious use cases
> 
> 4) Proposed specifications: OpenID Connect 1.0.
> 
> 5) Anticipated audience or users: Implementors of OpenID providers,
> relying parties, web browsers, and other non-browser applications.
> 
> 6) Language: English
> 
> 7) Method of work: E-mail discussions on the working group mailing
> list, working group conference calls, and face-to-face meetings at the
> Internet Identity Workshop and OpenID Foundation hosted summits.
> 
> 8) Basis for determining when the work is completed: Rough consensus
> and running code. The work will be completed once it is apparent that
> maximal consensus on the draft has been achieved, consistent with the
> purpose and scope.
> 
> 
> Background information:
> 1) Related work: OpenID Authentication 2.0 and related specifications,
> including Attribute Exchange (AX), Contract Exchange (CX), Provider
> Authentication Policy Extension (PAPE), and the draft User Interface
> (UI) Extension. OAuth 2.0. Web Host Metadata, Well Known URIs, LRDD,
> XRD, and JRD. OpenID v.Next Working Group proposals. Mozilla Account
> Manager. Google "EasyHybrid". The Connect Working Group is needed to
> explore how many of these related technologies can be used to build an
> open identity system for the web while remaining consistant with the
> principals behind OpenID 1.0 and OpenID 2.0. The Proposers have strong
> relationships in many of these communities and do not anticipate the
> need of formal liaisons.
> 
> 2) Proposers:
> David Recordon - [email protected] (editor)
> Allen Tom - [email protected]
> Chuck Mortimore - [email protected]
> Chris Messina - [email protected]
> Eran Hammer-Lahav - [email protected]
> Joseph Smarr - [email protected]
> Luke Shepard - [email protected]
> Martin Atkins - [email protected]
> Max Engel - [email protected]
> Thomas Huhn - [email protected]
> 
> 3) Anticipated contributions: OpenID Connect proposal
> (http://openidconnect.com) under the OpenID Foundation's IPR Policy.
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
> 
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to