On 2010-05-24, at 12:57 PM, David Recordon wrote: > One of the questions that a variety of people have asked the past few days is > why are we working on Connect versus just v.Next? I wanted to provide the > community with an answer. It turns out that while there are common themes > among the potential working group members, the reasons vary a litle.
I would still like to see the requirements reflected in the charter. <snip> > To Eran's point, this sort of technology is going to be built whether or not > the OpenID Foundation leads. Eran is clearly biased towards OAuth. :) > At our Board meeting a few months ago we changed our mission to include > supporting technologies beyond just OpenID 2.0. This is a perfect opportunity > to show that we actually mean it. That was not what the board changed the mission to. As the proposer of the motion, I am pretty clear on what we voted on. We said our mission was to build upon the OpenID Technology to solve the Internet Identity problem. I think that if you want to build identity on top of OAuth, that you should write an OAuth extension. -- Dick _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
