Interesting timing. I just wrote up a scenario to tease out the conversation somewhat. It is my next post to the list.
On 2010-05-24, at 8:27 PM, Manger, James H wrote: > Dick, > > I would appreciate an expansion of your thoughts (perhaps just a few dot > points) on which Internet identity problems or use cases an OAuth-based > approach is likely to miss, but OpenID (2.0 or v.Next) is likely to address. > > Sometimes I find it hard to remember the bigger picture when swamped with > technical details. > > -- > James Manger > > > ---------- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dick Hardt > Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:23 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Joseph Smarr; OpenID Board (public); [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Why Connect? > > ... >>> OpenID Connect as currently envisioned misses many of the internet identity >>> use cases. > > > ...I also think Connect has not holistically looked at what the broader > internet identity problems are, and is painting itself into an architecture > corner. > > As a creator of the OAuth hammer, I can see you view this as an OAuth nail. I > don't see it that way. > > ... > I see OpenID as a solution for the Internet Identity Problem. agree that > many have viewed OpenID as a protocol, and one that was good enough. OpenID > v.Next is queuing up to provide a holistic solution. The process for v.Next > was started a couple months ago. As you know, these things take time. _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
